HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care?

HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care?

HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care?

The matter of standardization of care has continued to receive attention from health care stakeholders due to the intransigence by physicians to adopt it. The origins of the resentment of the standardization of care resides in physicians’ perception that they are losing their professional status. Physicians content that the so-called evidence-based standardization of care has relegated them to play secondary roles to non-physician administrators (Hou, Cao, Zeng, & Cheng, 2017). Indeed, they feel that the health care economics has emasculated them by reclassifying them as mere providers and redefined patients as clients. Therefore, according to them, standardization has led to the existence of a language that is biased towards business while ensuring that the one associated with meaningful medical care does not exist.

It is evident that physicians have an important point when refusing to support standardization of care. Physicians having control over care is important as they become responsible for the kind of care that patients receive. During patient care, physicians are supposed to make decisions that are in the best interest of patients. However, this would not be the case with the standardization of care. Moreover, the complexity of health care makes it important that physicians do not lose control. When that happens, it means that the life of a patient will be at stake since they will not understand those complexities, which will leave them more confused (Ansmann & Pfaff, 2018). Therefore, there is validity in physicians’ opposition to the standardization of care.

If I were a physician, I would be planning to join formal employment. Given that the people who have formulated the laws to standardize care are determined to ensure that physicians lose their aura, it becomes important for one to seek for formal employment. During this period, advocacy campaigns will be conducted to reverse the trend and ensure that physicians remain at the help of medical care.

References

Ansmann, L., & Pfaff, H. (2018). Providers and Patients Caught Between Standardization and Individualization: Individualized Standardization as a Solution: Comment on”(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”. International journal of health policy and management, 7(4), 349.

Hou, F., Cao, L. L., Zeng, Y., & Cheng, Y. H. (2017, May). Healthcare Service Standardization in US and European Countries. In 3rd Annual International Conference on Management, Economics and Social Development (ICMESD 17). Atlantis Press.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care?

Sarah, thank you for making a great post on the essence of the discussion. I agree with you that one of the reasons

HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care
HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care

that physicians are resistant to the adoption of the standardized care due to the fact that they abhor change. However, the issues that the doctors are opposed against are not just ones that can be wished away. The standardization of care wants to place the physicians at the same level with people who may not have undertaken such a rigorous course (Hou, Cao, Zeng, & Cheng, 2017). Further, the standardization also wants to take the responsibility of the provision of care away from the physicians and give it to the patient and other stakeholders. Given the sensitivity of the matter, I think it is justified for the physicians to resist change. Incidentally, physicians need to prepare for a future wherein their roles are greatly curtailed. Strategies such as the adoption of evidence-based interventions and joining the formal employment arena may be useful in this respect.

References

Hou, F., Cao, L. L., Zeng, Y., & Cheng, Y. H. (2017, May). Healthcare Service Standardization in US and European Countries. In 3rd Annual International Conference on Management, Economics and Social Development (ICMESD 17). Atlantis Press.

Thank you for making a great post concerning the issue at hand. I concur with the observations that you have made concerning the issue of physicians’ resentment to the standardization of practice. The commercialization of care by adopting business terms and making physicians work under business managers does not augur well for the provision of quality care. Indeed, it exposes the physicians to quality issues as patients may nog receive the necessary care as important decisions are taken away from them (Ansmann & Pfaff, 2018). As such, it would only be logical for them to reject such arrangements as demanded by the standardization. Further, the adoption of EBP procedures in challenging the standardization is significant. The physicians may use that approach to change a few things about standardization while ensuring that care is centered upon patients.

References

Ansmann, L., & Pfaff, H. (2018). Providers and patients caught between standardization and individualization: Individualized standardization as a solution: Comment on”(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”. International journal of health policy and management, 7(4), 349.