Warning: preg_match_all(): Compilation failed: missing closing parenthesis at offset 105 in /home/layohatp/writingprofessors.com/wp-content/plugins/seo-by-rank-math/includes/replace-variables/class-post-variables.php on line 543

Warning: preg_match_all(): Compilation failed: missing closing parenthesis at offset 105 in /home/layohatp/writingprofessors.com/wp-content/plugins/seo-by-rank-math/includes/replace-variables/class-post-variables.php on line 543
HCA 699 What factors must be assessed when critically appraising quantitative studies (i.e., validity, reliability, and applicability)? - Writing Professors
Warning: preg_match_all(): Compilation failed: missing closing parenthesis at offset 105 in /home/layohatp/writingprofessors.com/wp-content/plugins/seo-by-rank-math/includes/replace-variables/class-post-variables.php on line 543

HCA 699 What factors must be assessed when critically appraising quantitative studies (i.e., validity, reliability, and applicability)?

HCA 699 What factors must be assessed when critically appraising quantitative studies (i.e., validity, reliability, and applicability)?

HCA 699 What factors must be assessed when critically appraising quantitative studies (i.e., validity, reliability, and applicability)?

Critical appraisal of quantitative research studies is fundamental as regards their applicability to practice. The assertion receives support from Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (2019) when they posit that healthcare practitioners should understand how to critically evaluate evidence so as to properly integrate it into practice. Whereas several aspects of quantitative studies can be used to assess them, validity, reliability, and applicability are the preferable parameters. Validity refers to the extent to which the results really measure what they are supposed to measure. Its assessment entails examining how well the results correspond to established theories and other measures of the same concept in a study. Reliability, on the other hand, refers to the reproducibility of a research when subjected to the same conditions. The assessment of reliability entails examining the consistency of results across time, across different observers, and across parts of the test itself. Applicability of the quantitative studies refers to the findings of the quantitative studies fitting into contexts external to the study conditions and they can receive utilization from researchers and clinicians.

The above article analyzed the effectiveness of hourly rounds on patient satisfaction as well as clinical outcomes. In other words, the research analyzed the effect of hourly rounding on quality parameters with positive outcomes (Brosey & March, 2015). In the present research, I am proposing that hourly rounding is an effective tool in the prevention of patient falls. One of the issues that affect patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes is patient falls. As such, the research validates the adoption of hourly nursing rounds to address the issue of patient falls in healthcare facilities.

References

Brosey, L. A., & March, K. S. (2015). Effectiveness of structured hourly nurse rounding on patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality30(2), 153-159.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HCA 699 What factors must be assessed when critically appraising quantitative studies (i.e., validity, reliability, and applicability)?

Expert opinions play an important role during the creation of EBP. Controversies have surrounded the usage of

HCA 699 What factors must be assessed when critically appraising quantitative studies (i.e., validity, reliability, and applicability)
HCA 699 What factors must be assessed when critically appraising quantitative studies (i.e., validity, reliability, and applicability)

expert opinions because they are not necessarily backed by research. Instead, they include point-of-care resources, textbooks, conference proceedings. However, expert opinions offer something to the creation of EBP. They offer a good introduction as well as offer generalized information about a condition or issue (Dang & Dearholt, 2017). Whereas expert opinions offer convenient summary, the fact that it takes three years for the information to be publicized demonstrates the rigorous nature of the process, which lends it validity hence applicability in EBP.

References

Dang, D., & Dearholt, S. L. (2017). Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice: Model and guidelines. Sigma Theta Tau.