PUB 550 Describe three methods for qualitative data collection and discuss an example of when each method would be used

PUB 550 Describe three methods for qualitative data collection and discuss an example of when each method would be used

PUB 550 Describe three methods for qualitative data collection and discuss an example of when each method would be used

The qualitative approach to data collection is observation. As Busetto et al. (2020) describe, the method involves using the five senses: sight, smell, touch, hearing, and taste. However, sight and hearing are the most commonly applied in medical research. Additionally, observation can be participant or non-participant, with the latter often used in ethnographic studies, where researchers avoid influencing or interrupting the research settings. In this regard, observation data collection approaches are best suited for studies requiring interaction with the participants. Reducing the distance between the observer and the subjects leads to enriched data and less participant bias.

Secondly, focus groups are often incorporated when collecting qualitative data. In such a case, Busetto et al. (2020) state that the method involves a group of participants employed in exploring their expertise and experiences, such as an explanation of people’s behaviors, including the “why” and “how” of such conduct. In most cases, the focus groups constitute six to eight individuals who offer their opinions on a subject. The approach can be used as a secondary approach in developing more in-depth themes or issues from a more significant qualitative result and when collecting data to build a survey. The emphasis is on less biased data.

Thirdly, semi-structured interviews assist researchers in collecting qualitative data, adding insights to a phenomenon of interest. Busetto et al. (2020) state that such approaches are applied in collecting a person’s subjective experiences, including attitudes, values, opinions, and motivations. Additionally, semi-structured and open-ended questionnaires are more suitable when collecting qualitative data, owing to their flexibility. Semi-structured interviews apply when a researcher wants to explore a participant’s thoughts, feelings, and beliefs related to a given topic. As highlighted, such subjective data is more suitable when a person wants to delve more deeply into the questions, which may often be sensitive or complex.

 

References

Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice2(1), 1-10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7650082

You made some excellent points here. To comprehend the exploratory causes and assess how and why a certain program or phenomenon functions in the way it does, researchers can do qualitative research. A researcher has access to a variety of qualitative data gathering techniques that they deem appropriate.

With the right information at hand, a seamless procedure ensures that all choices are made to benefit the company. Only if you have pertinent information at hand will you be able to make wise selections. Well! By using high-quality data, you may make better decisions while also raising the caliber of the outcomes you can anticipate from any undertaking (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2018).

Textual or non-numerical data make up the qualitative data. It mostly includes pictures, videos, texts, and peoples’ spoken or written words. You may choose from a variety of digital data gathering techniques, such as structured or semi-structured surveys, or you can go with the more conventional strategy that entails one-on-one interviews and group discussions.

One of the greatest techniques for determining the behavior and patterns regulating societal situations, events, or themes is qualitative research. Qualitative data rapidly explains the causes and logic behind a phenomenon, but quantitative data takes longer to do so (CDC, 2018).

 

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2018). Analyzing and Interpreting Data

https://www.cdc.gov/eis/field-epi-manual/chapters/analyze-Interpret-Data.html#anchor_1543585004

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: PUB 550 Describe three methods for qualitative data collection and discuss an example of when each method would be used

The three most common methods for qualitative data would be focus groups, in depth interviews and participant

PUB 550 Describe three methods for qualitative data collection and discuss an example of when each method would be used
PUB 550 Describe three methods for qualitative data collection and discuss an example of when each method would be used

observations. Each method has a distinctive purpose and is used for different methods. “The focus group approach is a qualitative method to collect the data on the selected topic with a structured and focused discussion in a small group of people.”(manju, 2020) Focus groups are most used to help other methods of data collection. Its main purpose is to provide in-depth information during a short term period. “In-depth interviewing is a qualitative research technique that involves conducting intensive individual interviews with a small number of respondents to explore their perspectives on a particular idea, program, or situation.” (Boyce, 2006) Interviews are the most common method used for a lot of data collection. In-depth interviews provide the possibility to capture rich, descriptive records about how human beings assume and behave, and unfold complicated approaches. “Participant observation (PO) is a research methodology where the researcher is immersed in the day-to-day activities of the participants. The objective is usually to record conduct under the widest range of possible settings.”(Utoronto)

References:

Manju Gundumogula, M. Gundumogula. Importance of Focus Groups in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IJHSS), Center for Promoting Ideas (CPI), USA, 2020, 8 (11), pp.299-302. ff10.24940/theijhss/2020/v8/i11/HS2011-082ff. Ffhal-03126126f

 

Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Monitoring and Evaluation -2 CONDUCTING IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth Interviews for EvaluationInput.https://nyhealthfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/m_e_tool_series_indepth_interviews-1.pdf

Participant Observation | Human Ethics Principles. (n.d.). Research.utoronto.ca. https://research.utoronto.ca/participant-observation#:~:text=Participant%20observation%20(PO)%20is%20a

The Qualitative Research Methods (n.d.) mentions that there are three qualitative data collection methods include participant’s observation, focus groups, and in-depth interviews. Participant observations involves the researcher to actively engage in the participant activities in the environment. Through observation and involvement, the researcher identifies and notes down the information of interest. For example, if the researcher needs information on a foreign language, he may enroll in such a class, complete assignments, attend field trips, interview the students, etc., to obtain data.

A Focus group entails the researcher carefully selecting individuals from a population and exploring how the people think and behave by asking why, how, and what questions. For example, a focus group of parents could be selected to discuss issues affecting children. The parents could share problems they have identified facing children and what they have done to solve them.

In-depth interviews involves conducting interviews by asking questions to the selected individuals to learn their perspectives on issues, ideas, programs, and situations. For example, the method could be applied in a healthcare setting or the managers could ask the microsystem leaders about their experiences and expectations on a given program. In this case, they will explain how they perceive the given issues, such as change resulting from their involvement in the program.

Reference

Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Field Guide. (n.d.). Retrieved from FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL: https://course.ccs.neu.edu/is4800sp12/resources/qualmethods.pdf

The composition of a focus group needs great care to get the best quality of discussion. There is no ‘best’ solution to group composition, and group mix will always impact on the data, according to things such as the mix of ages, sexes and social professional statuses of the participants. What is important is that the researcher gives due consideration to the impact of group mix (eg, how the group may interact with each other) before the focus group proceeds.

Interaction is key to a successful focus group. Sometimes this means a pre-existing group interacts best for research purposes, and sometimes stranger groups. Pre-existing groups may be easier to recruit, have shared experiences and enjoy a comfort and familiarity which facilitates discussion or the ability to challenge each other comfortably. In health settings, pre-existing groups can overcome issues relating to disclosure of potentially stigmatising status which people may find uncomfortable in stranger groups (conversely there may be situations where disclosure is more comfortable in stranger groups). In other research projects it may be decided that stranger groups will be able to speak more freely without fear of repercussion, and challenges to other participants may be more challenging and probing, leading to richer data.

Reference:

Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E. et al. Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. Br Dent J 204, 291–295 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192